Our editorial position
CAPE’s documents, the slate’s statements and a clearly attributed public allegation. Voting recommendations are this site’s editorial judgments.
CAPE / ACEP · Official results · Member login required
Counts transcribed from a supplied copy of CAPE’s results. Percentages are calculated from votes for and against, excluding abstentions, and rounded to one decimal. The original page requires a member login.
Read the original sourceNational Post · News report · June 2, 2025
Original report linked for readers. The account below relies on excerpts reposted to Reddit; we could not independently review the complete article.
Read the original sourceReddit · Secondary excerpts · June 3, 2025
Source inspected for the complaint and sockpuppet-account allegations. A third-party reproduction, not the original complaint or a disciplinary finding.
Read the original sourceYahoo News Canada · Article link
Additional article link provided for readers. Full text was not independently reviewed for this edition.
Read the original sourceMembers United / Membres Unis · Slate platform
The slate’s own account of its connection to Members for Change and its priorities for the next term.
Read the original sourceMembers United / Membres Unis · Candidate roster
Source for the slate affiliations and names in this guide. Inclusion here does not mean a candidate personally voted for every past NEC decision.
Read the original sourceCAPE / ACEP · Official voting package
The proposed dues structure, member resolutions and implementation cost estimates. Proposals and estimates are not evidence of actual expenditure.
Read the original sourceCAPE / ACEP · Official PDF · 13 pages
Recommendations on CAPE’s mandate, external campaigns and financial disclosure, with the NEC’s explanations.
Read the original sourceCAPE / ACEP · Official vote results
Context matters: participating members supported numerous reforms, including greater access to NEC minutes and recordings.
Read the original source